Prosecutors ask Supreme Court to review the Bill Cosby case : NPR


Attorney Jennifer Bonjean, Bill Cosby, and spokesperson Andrew Wyatt speaking outside of Cosby’s suburban Philadelphia home in June, after the actor was released from prison.

Michael Abbott/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Michael Abbott/Getty Images

Attorney Jennifer Bonjean, Bill Cosby, and spokesperson Andrew Wyatt speaking outside of Cosby’s suburban Philadelphia home in June, after the actor was released from prison.

Michael Abbott/Getty Images

Prosecutors in Montgomery County, Pa. are appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court to review a state high court decision that allowed comedian and actor Bill Cosby to walk free less than three years after he was convicted of assaulting a woman in a high-profile #MeToo case.

Cosby’s indecent assault conviction in April 2018 was overturned last June, after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the actor’s due process rights had been violated.

He had been charged for an alleged 2004 assault against Andrea Constand, who had been working for the women’s basketball team at Temple University in Philadelphia, after prosecutors had told him that they wouldn’t bring criminal charges against him. At the time the ruling was overturned, Cosby had served more than two years of a scheduled three- to 10-year sentence.

In his appeal to the state Supreme Court, Cosby argued that a statement made by then-district attorney Bruce L. Castor Jr. in 2005 promised Cosby would not face criminal charges stemming from Constand’s allegations that Cosby had drugged and sexually assaulted her at his home.

Castor has said that he told Cosby’s lawyer verbally that he would not prosecute the actor and comedian, and that he then issued a press release announcing that his office’s criminal investigation had concluded. In court, Castor testified that he took those measures in an attempt to get Cosby to testify in any civil suit filed by Costand. In its June ruling, the state Supreme Court found that non-prosecution agreement binding.

In a press release Monday, Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin R. Steele said the Pennsylviania Supreme Court’s decision could set a precedent that “prosecutors’ statements in press releases now seemingly create immunity.”

“This decision as it stands will have far-reaching negative consequences beyond Montgomery County and Pennsylvania,” Steele said. “The U.S. Supreme Court can right what we believe is a grievous wrong.”

In a statement sent to NPR, Cosby spokesperson Andrew V. Wyatt argued that the Montgomery County D.A. is asking the nation’s highest court to “throw the Constitution out the window, as it did, to satisfy the #metoo mob.”

“This is a pathetic last-ditch effort that will not prevail,” he wrote, adding that Steele’s “fixation with Mr. Cosby is troubling to say the least.”

According to the official U.S. Courts website, the Supreme Court is asked to review more than 7,000 cases per year, and only hears about 100 to 150 appeals each year.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

veto power
Article Laws in India Legal Updates/News

The Veto Power in Legislative Framework: A Comprehensive Analysis of Veto Legislation in India

The concept of veto power in legislative processes holds a significant place in democratic governance, and India, as the world’s largest democracy, has a complex and nuanced legislative structure.

Read More
hindu marriage act and supreme court judgements
Article Laws in India Legal Updates/News

Understanding the Hindu Marriage Act and Key Supreme Court Judgments

Understanding the Hindu Marriage Act and Key Supreme Court Judgments

Read More
Money Laundering
Article Laws in India Legal Updates/News

Unraveling the Complex Web of Money Laundering, its 3 stages: A Deep Dive into Notorious Cases

Money laundering is a pervasive and intricate criminal activity that poses a significant threat to the global financial system

Read More